Monday, 2 February 2009

Agile Test Strategy

[THIS POST HAS BEEN UPDATED: Please visit Agile Test strategy Updated!]

Over the years I have had to design really heavy weight test strategies to help sell/communicate to the business the reasons why we are testing and what we will do during each project. However, I have always found that no matter how good the intention set out in the test strategy is, what actually occurs during the test phase of a project is almost unidentifiable. Fortunately, on the last project I worked on I had the opportunity to develop a lean test strategy that was useful, practical, reusable, and above all, CMMi friendly!

Although not strictly a company that practised agile or lean development, we were trying to reduce the bureaucracy of traditional technical processes. The following is probably as light weight as a test strategy can get, but it works.

The idea was to make a statement of intention that loosely binds some of the more important test practices that can help a team move forward. The phases are fairly typical of agile development, although they do not represent a definite task execution flow.

Phase: Project Set Up
  • Understand the project
  • Collect information about the project
  • Create a test knowledge repository
Phase: Planning & Analysis or Release Planning
  • Assist in the definition and scope of stories
  • Develop test plans based on planning session
Phase: Development Iterations
  • Risk analysis during the sprint/iteration planning
  • Construct acceptance tests for each story
  • Develop business functionality validation plan
  • Document and write tests for defects
  • Automate with both unit and UI tests
  • Assist in functional review/demo
  • Accept User stories
Phase: Hardening Iterations
  • Regression test
  • Business acceptance testing
  • Develop release readiness plan
  • Run performance tests
Phase: Release
  • Assist in release readiness
  • Plan test release data and tests
  • Accept the Release
Using this basis for every project we can deliver software that has undergone rigorous testing but has not been delayed through the burden of traditional test documentation.

1 comment:

Michael Kelly said...

Great stuff. I like how you laid it out by phase.